Academics

Closed geodesics and the first Betti number

Time:Tues., 21:00-22:00, Dec. 17, 2024

Organizer:Jialong Deng, Akito Futaki

Speaker:Marco Mazzucchelli

Differential Geometry Seminar (Cancelled)


Organizers:

Jialong Deng, Akito Futaki


Speaker:

Marco Mazzucchelli (ENS Lyon)

Time:

Tues., 21:00-22:00, Dec. 17, 2024

Title:

Closed geodesics and the first Betti number

Abstract:

In this talk, based on a joint work with Gonzalo Contreras, I will present the following result: on a closed Riemannian manifold of dimension at least two with non-trivial first Betti number, the existence of a minimal closed geodesic, in the sense of Aubry-Mather theory, implies the existence of a transverse homoclinic, and thus of a horseshoe, for the geodesic flow of a suitable -close Riemannian metric. As a corollary of this result and of existing literature, we infer that on any closed manifold of dimension at least two with non-trivial first Betti number, a generic Riemannian metric has infinitely many closed geodesics, and indeed closed geodesics of arbitrarily large length.

DATEDecember 17, 2024
SHARE
Related News
    • 0

      The Betti side of double shuffle relations

      Seminar on periods and motives Organizers:Jin Cao (THU), Ma Luo (ECNU), Jie Zhou (THU)Speaker:Prof. Hidekazu Furusho (Nagoya University)Time:Friday, 9:30-10:30 am, Oct. 25, 2024Venue:C654, Shuangqing Complex BuildingTitle:The Betti side of double shuffle relationsAbstract:This lecture presents joint work with Enriquez, addressing the Betti side of Racinet's study on double shuffle relation...

    • 1

      Almost Complex Manifolds with Prescribed Betti Numbers

      AbstractThe original version of Sullivan's rational surgery realization theorem provides necessary and sufficient conditions for a prescribed rational cohomology ring to be realized by a simply-connected smooth closed manifold. We will present a version of the theorem for almost complex manifolds. It has been shown there exist closed smooth manifolds M^n of Betti number b_i=0 except b_0=b_{n/2}...